<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: *Google U.S. trademark policy liberalization (Adv+) -again-</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austrotrabant.wordpress.com/2009/05/16/google-u-s-trademark-policy-liberalization-adv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austrotrabant.wordpress.com/2009/05/16/google-u-s-trademark-policy-liberalization-adv/</link>
	<description>As I keep researching for my Doctoral Thesis...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:55:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: *&#8221;Why Buy an Imitation?&#8221;: Acts of Unfair Competition Through Keyword Advertising &#171; Austrotrabant&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://austrotrabant.wordpress.com/2009/05/16/google-u-s-trademark-policy-liberalization-adv/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>*&#8221;Why Buy an Imitation?&#8221;: Acts of Unfair Competition Through Keyword Advertising &#171; Austrotrabant&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrotrabant.wordpress.com/?p=175#comment-257</guid>
		<description>[...] Please bear in mind at this stage that because the defendant had not referenced the plaintiff&#8217;s trademark in the ad copy, Google would not act on behalf of the plaintiff, meaning that the trademark owner had to go to court to fight against the display this ad. Summary of Google&#8217;s TM policy: here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Please bear in mind at this stage that because the defendant had not referenced the plaintiff&#8217;s trademark in the ad copy, Google would not act on behalf of the plaintiff, meaning that the trademark owner had to go to court to fight against the display this ad. Summary of Google&#8217;s TM policy: here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: *UK reference for preliminary ruling on Keyword Advertising &#8211; Interflora v Marks&#38;Spencer &#171; Austrotrabant&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://austrotrabant.wordpress.com/2009/05/16/google-u-s-trademark-policy-liberalization-adv/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>*UK reference for preliminary ruling on Keyword Advertising &#8211; Interflora v Marks&#38;Spencer &#171; Austrotrabant&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrotrabant.wordpress.com/?p=175#comment-228</guid>
		<description>[...] to block the selection of signs identical to their trade marks as keywords by other parties? [AdWords trademark policy issue]   [Liability by Google/AdWords]  5. Where the search engine operator (i) presents a sign which is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to block the selection of signs identical to their trade marks as keywords by other parties? [AdWords trademark policy issue]   [Liability by Google/AdWords]  5. Where the search engine operator (i) presents a sign which is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iBlawg.cl</title>
		<link>http://austrotrabant.wordpress.com/2009/05/16/google-u-s-trademark-policy-liberalization-adv/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>iBlawg.cl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrotrabant.wordpress.com/?p=175#comment-32</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Cambio en la política marcaria de Google para su avisaje en&#160;línea...&lt;/strong&gt;

Un cambio en la política marcaria de Google afectará a 194 países a partir del 4 de junio de 2009. 
......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cambio en la política marcaria de Google para su avisaje en&nbsp;línea&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Un cambio en la política marcaria de Google afectará a 194 países a partir del 4 de junio de 2009.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cambio en la política marcaria de Google para su avisaje en línea &#171; iBlawg.cl</title>
		<link>http://austrotrabant.wordpress.com/2009/05/16/google-u-s-trademark-policy-liberalization-adv/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Cambio en la política marcaria de Google para su avisaje en línea &#171; iBlawg.cl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrotrabant.wordpress.com/?p=175#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...] Policy: &#8220;What, Me Worry?&#8221; Part 2, Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog; Schubert, *Google U.S. trademark policy liberalization (Adv+) -again, Austrotrabant&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Policy: &#8220;What, Me Worry?&#8221; Part 2, Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog; Schubert, *Google U.S. trademark policy liberalization (Adv+) -again, Austrotrabant&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
