*Two Steps Back, One To the Side And One Forward: The Google AdWords Policy Foxtrot Continues

Google has introduced four changes since the ECJ has issued its ruling on Google France on the 23rd of March. Two of them can be seen as defensive, one as very progressive and one as kind of a slightly defensive side-step …and as of course the dance will continue…

.

.

 

screenshot by rustybrick via searchengineland.com

 

.

I haven’t had a chance to witness this change myself (please see the corresponding post and screenshots on searchengineland.com) and it is still not sure if and when Google will roll it out globally, but it indeed appears absolutely sensible to me as “ads” is a much clearer and far less ambiguous term than “sponsored links“.

In my opinion Google won’t lose a lot if it puts straight forward that the content that is shown besides it’s search results is commercial communication = ads. This will it make it much more difficult for TM owners to argue that search engine users might have been mistaken about the nature of this content. This might be true although research has shown that people actually do not pay a lot of attention to the labelling but during their first searches quickly ‘learn’ that information shown is this section is mostly irrelevant to them and thus in the future simply ignore this section (Inattentional Blindness = Banner Blindness).

.

At this point I’d like however to point to the Austrian Supreme Court of  Justice (OGH) which found in a 2009 ruling (OGH 14.07.2009, 4 Ob 62/09k, Promotion II) that the labelling of commercial content in a rural newspaper as “Promotion” is misleading as people living in the countryside (Vorarlberg: lot’s of mountains there) might misunderstand the meaning of this word (which is of latin roots and also used to describe a move in chess and the formal act of receiving a doctoral degree).

AdWords on Google Austria are however (already) labelled as “Anzeigen” (=”Ads”), so that not even Heidi and Alm-Öhi should be mistaken as to nature of the information displayed. … Well… only the OGH very persistently found that the labelling of top-ads as “Anzeigen” was not not sufficient … but that is thanks to the ECJ already ‘legal history‘  ;)

.

PS: Apologies for the lame metaphor… but when have YOU pondered for the last time about dancing steps?

2 Responses to “*Two Steps Back, One To the Side And One Forward: The Google AdWords Policy Foxtrot Continues”


  1. 1 Martin Husovec 13/10/2010 at 18:05

    Max by the way, today was Interflora C-323/09 hearing.


  1. 1 *Google Slightly Changes Layout of Top-Ads – Further Blurring The Line Between Ads and Search Results? « Austrotrabant's Blog Trackback on 07/02/2011 at 09:03

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




This Satelite Doesn’t Beep But It ‘Tweets’

Please click here if you want to follow this blog on Twitter.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 95 other followers

Author’s Rights

Stopline.at

Stopline.at - Online reporting hotline for child pornography and nationalsocialist content on the internet
JuraBlogs - Die Welt juristischer Blogs
Herdict.org

Previous Posts:

RSS WIRED Epicenter

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
wordpress stat

%d bloggers like this: